Blood Test Herbal Tea

night thoughts

Torffirmen are interested in former swamps, for example, for the potting soil can abtorfen. Many older Farmers without successors are interested in selling their land to maximize profitability. I do not know the exact numbers, but the order of they get from their neighbors 3-4000 € / ha and the Torffirmen 10,000 € / ha In the first case, the area continues to be used for intensive agriculture, in the second building from the company about 20-30 years peat, except for a small residual layer. Conservationists follow them after Abtorfung, rehabilitating the area and turn it into another bog. If you get there not a node in the brain?

construction companies to build such a large project like a highway. This will inevitably destroyed areas before the nature's disposal, that is where many wild animals, birds and plants had a home. Now investigating the company a so-called compensation area, such as a meadow with trees and hedges or orchards. This area is charged with the destroyed: "While here I destroy nature, but over there is a large area exactly the same nature, which is not destroyed." So we could destroy half the earth and everything is still balanced? And the talk is of conservation?

If a previously agricultural or fallow land should be turned into a bog is flooded it. Animals and plants that live there now do virtually a deluge. Trees die off, animals have to find another home. If you are lucky, eventually settle marsh plants and animals that can live in this very special habitat, it's maybe not. With the same view, one could also flood the Holland "renature" and. Accordingly, restoration is at least such a large encroachment on the natural development as a construction project. Actually, the natural areas to regain easily if one gives her the chance. for a bog is actually more valuable than, say, idle wetlands? And who determines that?

If I had the first 10-15 years of my professional life, used to a lot of money to deserve, regardless of the environmental sins of my employer, with its production or operation commits, I could now occur as a generous conservationists, because I had accumulated enough money. However, because I have since my youth trying to live as a prudent environmentalist, I can not accumulate enough money. I found no foundation. But can we make good on this way, the actual environmental sins committed during that period or is this another one of sleight of hand as with the compensation areas? "Earn money first, then protect nature," Can we afford such a priority list?